Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Selmon F. Owens v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-78233
Plaintiff:
Selmon F. Owens
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
OWENS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv78233
Plaintiff:
SELMON F. OWENS and SELMON F. OWENS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
OWENS et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC. et al
as 2:2009cv65551
Plaintiff:
BILLY F. OWENS and WANDA KAY OWENS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Billy F. Owens, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as SC/8:09-CV-00176
Plaintiff:
Billy F. Owens
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
OWENS v. I-FLOW CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER F. OWENS, CHRISTOPHER F. OWENS and CHRISTOPHER F. OWENS
Defendant:
I-FLOW CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Owens et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Billy F Owens and Wanda Kay Owens
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
John Turner v. Stephen Owen
as 08-1954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PAUL TURNER, a/k/a Pops
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN F. OWEN, City Manager, Staunton, Virginia
Turner v. Owen
as 7:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
John Paul Turner
Defendant:
Stephen F. Owen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Global Materials & Services Inc et al
as 8:2008cv00881
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Global Materials & Services Inc, Stephen F Owens, Asmac Financial Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Owen v. No Parking Today Inc.
as 1:2008cv05626
Plaintiff:
Karl F. Owen
Defendant:
No Parking Today Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
