Cases 41 - 50 of 59
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv00222
Defendant:
BAEZ, BAKER, BELL and others
Plaintiff:
GARY LONG, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01007
Plaintiff:
Gary Long, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BENSON v. MCBRAYER et al
as 5:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE BENSON
Defendant:
KEITH MCBRAYER, GARY LONG, JAMES MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENSON v. MCBRAYER
as 5:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE BENSON
Defendant:
KEITH MCBRAYER, GARY LONG and JAMES MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALE vs TOWALIGA CIRCUIT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS et al
as 5:2017cv00463
Plaintiff:
PAUL DOUGLAS HALE
Defendant:
TOWALIGA CIRCUIT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, STATE OF GEORGIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Enrique Montoya, et al v. PNC Bank, N.A., et al
as 16-12398
Interested Party - Appellant:
GARY LONG and BARBARA LONG
Defendant - Appellee:
PNC BANK, N.A., AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, STANDARD GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
CHRONISTER v. BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CHRONISTER
Defendant:
BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA, BUTTS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, GARY LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
GARY LONG, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , LANGHORNE BOROUGH, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gary Long, Jr. v. United State
as 14-2398
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gary Long, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Long v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv01012
Movant:
Gary Long, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
