Cases 41 - 50 of 1,002
Gavidia- Salgado, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1583
Petitioner:
FATIMA GABRIELA GAVIDIA-SALGADO, ANDERSON GONZALO GAVIDIA-SALGADO and SIGFREDO ARISTIDES NAVARRETE GAVIDIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Musgrove v. Curiel
as 3:2023cv01613
Plaintiff:
Irvin Musgrove
Defendant:
Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 va Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Colorado v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv03667
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Garcia Colorado
Respondent:
WARDEN and FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zepeda Rivas et al v. Jennings et al
as 3:2020cv02731
Plaintiff:
DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, JAVIER ALFARO and others
Defendant:
Acting Director DAVID JENNINGS, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Geo Group, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Kethikoun Keo, Rachana Duong and Jose Eduardo Guerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hernandez Alamilla v. Warden at FCI Petersburg
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Hernandez Alamilla
Respondent:
Warden at FCI Petersburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fila-Naula v. Garland
as 22-6473
Petitioner:
GONZALO EDWIN FILA-NAULA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
GRIJALVA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18774
Plaintiff:
GONZALO GRIJALVA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Ramirez
as 23-10722
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gonzalo Briseno Ramirez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00967
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanchez-Perez v. Garland
as 23-800
Petitioner:
GONZALO SANCHEZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
