Cases 41 - 49 of 49
USA v. Harold Oliver, Jr.
as 11-1876
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HAROLD LEWIS OLIVER, JR.
Scott et al v. W.R. Grace & Company et al
as 2:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Scott , Holloway Adkins , Harold Lewis Bailey and others
Defendant:
W.R. Grace & Company, Chevron Corporation, NFS Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS et al v. AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80846
Plaintiff:
IRENE LEWIS , HAROLD LEWIS , MARY HOWARD and others
Defendant:
AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD, COLONIAL SUGAR REFINING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2009cv06133
Plaintiff:
Harold Lewis, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
DeGruy et al v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2009cv04024
Plaintiff:
Hilda Oliver DeGruy, Hilda Oliver DeGruy, Michael DeGruy and others
Defendant:
Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Lewis v. Derral Adams, et al
as 09-55591
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD HAROLD LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ronald Harold Lewis v. Warden Derral G. Adams
as 5:2008cv01325
Respondent:
Derral G Adams and People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Ronald Harold Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Universal Fidelity LP
as 2:2008cv00661
Plaintiff:
Harold Lewis
Defendant:
Universal Fidelity LP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2008cv10314
Plaintiff:
James Rogers
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Harold Lewis, Willie Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
