Cases 41 - 50 of 4,027
Fox et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Robert Fox, Thomas Elsberry, William English and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Saadeh v. Kagan
as 24-163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAFIC SAADEH
Defendant:
MICHAEL KAGAN and THE ESTATE OF IRVING KAGAN, by Its Administrator, Michael Kagan
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA KAGAN
Windsor v. Campos et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Prince' Amelio Mason Windsor, I and Maximus Windor-Mountbatten
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Campos, S. Renn, B. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving Weinstein v. ATH Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Irving Weinstein
Defendant:
ATH HOLDINGS LLC, ATH NY CM LLC d/b/a ARTECHOUSE and ATH NY CM LLC doing business as Artechouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
IRVING v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
DEJON IRVING
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
US v. Ramirez-Camacho
as 24-1031
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIO IRVING RAMIREZ-CAMACHO
Leonard v. United States of America
as 24-64
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVERNE M. LEONARD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING MEDICAL CENTER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, COLLEN RICHARD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Beckman et al v. Tran et al
as 1:2023cv06000
Plaintiff:
Richard Irving Beckman and Kari Ann Beckman
Defendant:
Father Augustine Tran, REGINA CAELI, INC., REGINA CAELI ACADEMY and others
Weissman v. Clark
as 23-4407
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN IRVING WEISSMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
KEN CLARK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
