Cases 41 - 50 of 914
KING v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
ISSAC KING, JR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, JOE JAMES, DOOLY STATE PRISON MEDICAL UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores et al v. Chaves County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Beverly Flores, Jose A. Barron and Selena Villa
Defendant:
Chavez County Sheriff's Office, Mike Herrington, David Whitzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
PAREDES v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
ISSAC PAREDES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shabazz v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Letoya Hughes, Debbie Issacs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith Arizmendez v. McCourt
as 3:2023cv01625
Plaintiff:
Issac L. Smith Arizmendez
Defendant:
Daniel McCourt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales Pita v. Garland
as 23-2030
Petitioner:
ISSAC MORALES PITA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cape v. Bexar County et al
as 5:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
John Cape
Defendant:
Bexar County, Javier Salazar, Ferman Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Bexar Co. TX et al
as 5:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Louie Garcia
Defendant:
Bexar Co. TX, Javier Salazar, Ferman Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaron Katz Law LLC v. Laufer
as 1:2023cv11801
Plaintiff:
Aaron Katz Law LLC
Defendant:
Mr. Issac Laufer and Issac Laufer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
