Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Marlene Ryder v. Terrence McCabe, et al
as 12-1983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLENE RYDER, Ethel-Mae Williams For The Witnessing Of The Parse-Syntax-Grammer of the Vasalees Fraud- Documents
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRENCE J. MCCABE, Esq., MCCABE WEISBERG CONWAY, MARC S. WEISBERG, ESQ. and others
Dale v. McCabe et al
as 2:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale
Defendant:
Robert J. McCabe, Deputy Schrieber and Deputy Ginyard & Knighton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuffee v. McCabb
as 2:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert Cuffee
Defendant:
Robert J. McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTS v. MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. et al
as 5:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
DELANNE WALTS
Defendant:
MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C., TERENCE J. MCCABE, MARC S. WEISBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
RYDER v. MCCABE et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
MARLENE RYDER
Defendant:
TERRANCE J. MCCABE , MCCABE, WEISBERG AND CONWAY, P.C. , MARK S. WEISBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romious v. Brooks and Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03033
Plaintiff:
Carlos Romious
Defendant:
Brooks and Associates, Inc., Chris Brooks, Thomas Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUMPHREYS et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., INC. et al
as 5:2011cv06362
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA L. HUMPHREYS and BRIAN C. HUMPHREYS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., INC., MCCABE, WEISBERG AND CONWAY, P.C., TERRENCE J. MCCABE, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCCABE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50742
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER J. MCCABE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Franklin Smith v. Robert McCabe, et al
as 11-13662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT J. MCCABE, BALDWIN, Cpl., WILLIAMS, FNU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
