Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Halinski et al v. Cook Group Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv02141
Plaintiff:
Anthony Halinski , Larry Combs , Nancy Rhines and others
Defendant:
Cook Group Incorporated , Cook Incorporated , Cook Medical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Halinski et al v. Cook Group Incorporated et al
as MOE/4:16-cv-02141
Plaintiff:
Anthony Halinski , Larry Combs , Nancy Rhines and others
Defendant:
Cook Group Incorporated , Cook Incorporated , Cook Medical LLC and others
Jones v. Walsh et al
as 2:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jones
Defendant:
Dan Walsh, Arnold Mathews, Beth Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genevieve Monreal et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02079
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Monreal , Sharon Adams , Diane Beringer and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Genevieve Monreal et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:02-16-04007
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Monreal , Sharon Adams , Diane Beringer and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
Genevieve Monreal et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04007
Plaintiff:
Sharon Adams, Diane Beringer, Mary Ann Bracey and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Chaney v. Jones et al
as 1:2015cv02808
Defendant:
Jacqueline Jones, Landon Dowden and City of Leesville
Plaintiff:
Darian Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaney v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv02808
Defendant:
Jacqueline Jones, Landon Dowden and City of Leesville
Plaintiff:
Darian Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
