Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Patricia Wate v. Kenneth Kubler
as 15-15611
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PATRICIA JUANITA WATE, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of James Clifton Barnes, Deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH KUBLER
Barnes v. Daniel Howard Barrett, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv03816
Plaintiff:
James Lyndon Barnes
Defendant:
Daniel Howard Barrett, Inc. and Daniel H. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Barnes v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 14-15113
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES R. BARNES
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02385
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARNES v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05099
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Barnes v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv01249
Petitioner:
James Ellis Barnes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BARNES v. HARLOW, ET AL et al
as 1:2013cv01411
Petitioner:
James Charles Barnes
Respondent:
Michael W. Harlow, et al and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNES v. HARLOW, ET AL et al
as 1:2013cv00120
Petitioner:
JAMES CHARLES BARNES
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW, ET AL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. City Of Elgin, et al
as 1:2012cv10360
Plaintiff:
Phillipp D. Brown
Defendant:
City Of Elgin, Sean Rafferty and James R. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Barnes, Jr. v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv15256
Plaintiff:
James Henry Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
