Cases 41 - 50 of 552
DeAngelo Thomas-El v. Nicole Francis, et al
as 22-3617
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DeAngelo Lamont Thomas-El
Defendant / Appellant:
Nicole Francis, Case Manager, Individual Capacity and Jason Lee
Harris v. Gregorio
as 2:2022cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Unknown Gregorio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23495
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kimbrell v. Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Jody D Kimbrell and Jody Kimbrell
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development, Bank of America, NA, Brian T Moyniham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jason Harris v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70256
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JASON LEE HARRIS, STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Petitioner:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Sportsman v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01198
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Sportsman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Urban v. Deweese et al
as 1:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Urban T. Tante, Jr. and Tante T. Urban, Jr.
Defendant:
Wendy M. Deweese, Peter Stone, Victor Kruse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01844
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lee v. USA
as 3:2022cv06076
Petitioner:
Jason Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 2:2022cv01737
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
