Cases 41 - 50 of 243
HIGHTOWER v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv82214
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., Apotex Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DANIEL HIGHTOWER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Stevenson et al
as 2:2020cv00286
Defendant:
Ivan NKA Bong, Heather Butler and Garrett Stevenson
Plaintiff:
Raymond John Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Advanced Embroidery & Screen Printing, Inc. v. Smith
as 1:2020cv05030
Plaintiff:
Advanced Embroidery & Screen Printing, Inc.
Defendant:
John Daniel Smith doing business as Embroider-All
WORSHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05751
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DANIEL WORSHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05540
Plaintiff:
John Daniel
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stolarz v. Howard
as 3:2020cv01772
Respondent:
Catricia Howard
Petitioner:
John Daniel Stolarz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OSBORNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99076
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DANIEL OSBORNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Manookian v. Floyd Flippin, et al
as 20-5979
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DANIEL KITCH, in his official and individual capacities, BRIDGET J. WILLHITE, in her official and individual capacities, JODY PICKENS, in her official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN MANOOKIAN
Congoo LLC v. Revcontent LLC, et al
as 20-2745
Defendant / Appellee:
REVCONTENT LLC and JOHN DANIEL LEMP
Appellee:
ASHRAF NASHED
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONGOO LLC
AKERS v. PLASSE
as 2:2020cv00392
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE
Plaintiff:
JOHN DANIEL AKERS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
