Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Williams v. King et al
as 1:2019cv04856
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Janet King, Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield, III and Magistrate Judge Gerrilyn G. Brill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Scott & Associates LLC et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv08736
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams, WSA, LLC and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Scott & Associates LLC et al v. Yates et al
as 1:2019cv04253
Defendant:
Jonathan Nuechterlein, Jennifer D. Odom, Valerie Verduse and others
Plaintiff:
Williams, Scott & Associates LLC and John T. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams, Scott & Associates LLC et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv03469
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams and Williams, Scott & Associates LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv05692
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Williams v. Ellis et al
as 1:2019cv04353
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Ronald Ellis, Annalisa Torres and Richard J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 19-608
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John T. Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01630
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00837
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Bharara
as 19-248
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Fuqua, Receiver, James N. Hatten, Clerk of Court, GA, Marcela C. Mateo and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John T. Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
