Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Baker v. Brown
as 6:2018cv01593
Defendant:
Kimberly Brown
Plaintiff:
Scott J. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HSBC BANK USA v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv03741
Defendant:
KIMBERLY BROWN and RICHARD BROWN
Plaintiff:
HSBC BANK USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brown v. Godwin et al
as 3:2018cv02261
Defendant:
Culbreath Kenneth, R Godwin, Sharon L Hancock and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Res-Care, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brown
Defendant:
Res-Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv02057
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
DAVID W. BROWN, KIMBERLY BROWN, IDIN INTERNATIONAL, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jean Crump v. Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 18-55624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN CRUMP, AKA Jean Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., DBA Marvin Gardens Halfway House, DURON, Mr.; Supervisor at Marvin Gardens Halfway House, KIMBERLY BROWN, Employee at Marvin Gardens Halfway House and others
BROWN et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01215
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY BROWN and GREGORY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jean Crump v. Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02674
Defendant:
Ms. Kimberly Brown, Mr. Joe Cubit, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Crump
CAREY v. CAROL BROWN DBA THE CAROL BROWN TEAM OR CAROL BROWN PA et al
as 3:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE CAREY
Defendant:
CAROL BROWN DBA THE CAROL BROWN TEAM OR CAROL BROWN PA , CAROL BROWN , KIMBERLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
