Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Bey (ID 2000037844) v. Clark et al
as 5:2026cv03117
Plaintiff:
Ahmed K. Bey
Defendant:
Tyler Clark, Chris Dean, Maria G. Bos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Curtis et al v. Shaltry et al
as 1:2026cv03642
Plaintiff:
KATHERYN CURTIS and KATE MCENROE NEW YORK LLC
Defendant:
DIANNA SHALTRY and DESIGNS WITH DIANNA LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Koko v. Broton
as 7:2026cv00726
Petitioner:
Kate Egondu Koko
Respondent:
Jennifer Broton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melunsky et al v. LinkedIn Corporation
as 5:2026cv03460
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Melunsky, Dana Cutolo, Kate Shimshock and others
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Melunsky et al v. Gupta et al
as 5:2026cv03457
Plaintiff:
Clarissa Melunsky, Dana Cutolo, Kate Shimshock and others
Defendant:
Shubhranshu Gupta and LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Finley v. Group Fox Property Management et al
as 1:2026cv04575
Plaintiff:
Akiya Finley
Defendant:
Group Fox Property Management, Kate OKane, William Okane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEYTON v. CENTURION HEALTH CARE OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2026cv00821
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH GABRIEL MALIK PEYTON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH CARE OF INDIANA LLC, KATE WILK, BRITTANY WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
