Cases 41 - 50 of 1,602
Davis v. Keefe
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Rondell Davis
Defendant:
Keefe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Keefe Group
as 24-109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant / Appellee:
KEEFE GROUP and KRAFT HEINZ FOOD COMPANY
Griffin v. Edwards et al
as 4:2024cv04006
Plaintiff:
Jeramiah J Griffin
Defendant:
Martin Edwards, City of Monmouth Illinois, Warren County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keefe v. Salmonsen et al
as 4:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Keefe
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Kaufmann v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Chase Trevor Kaufmann
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goggins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
as 3:2023cv01493
Petitioner:
Bryan Keefe Goggins, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andred Davis, Jr. v. Paul Diamond
as 23-7284
Plaintiff:
ANDRED CLINTON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
PAUL DIAMOND, CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, BETSY JIVIDEN and others
Wholey v. Bradley, et al
as 23-2076
Petitioner:
JOHN F. WHOLEY, JR.
Respondent:
HONORABLE JUDGE HEATHER BRADLEY, Hingham District Court, JUDGE JAMES BYRNE, Hingham District Court, CLERK MAGISTRATE PAUL FULLAM, Hingham District Court and others
Sydney Keefe v. Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc., et al
as 23-14024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SYDNEY MARIE KEEFE
Defendant / Appellant:
BRITT'S BOW WOW BOUTIQUE, INC. and MERRI COLVARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
