Cases 41 - 50 of 100
McClure v. Lumpkin
as 26-40194
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Warden Carter, Todd Allen and others
Calbazana v. Pope et al
as 3:2026cv00241
Plaintiff:
Catherine Calbazana
Defendant:
Bradley Pope, Vandiver, W.C. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laborin Ledesma v. Blanche
as 26-1896
Petitioner:
JUAN LABORIN LEDESMA
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01974
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv21935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00772
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEDESMA v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2026cv01370
Plaintiff:
JUAN R. LEDESMA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv60489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00471
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
