Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Taylor v. Randolph et al
as 0:2014cv60791
Plaintiff:
Teresa Taylor
Defendant:
Jeanette Randolph, Latonya Philips, M. Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KAPLAN v. USA
as 1:2014cv00067
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kaplan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02875
Plaintiff:
Susan M. Kaplan and John Kaplan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boston Private Bank and Trust Company v. Snake River Sporting Club Development Company, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv13043
Plaintiff:
Boston Private Bank and Trust Company
Defendant:
Snake River Sporting Club Development Company, LLC, Snake River Sporting Club, Inc., Dean Gary A. Barney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Vasek v. Parametric Sound Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv02148
Defendant:
James L Honore, Robert M Kaplan, Elwood G Norris and others
Plaintiff:
Shana Vasek
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Hans Reiser v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-72985
:
In re: HANS REISER
Petitioner:
HANS REISER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
WILLIAM H. DU BOIS, ROBERT NAVARRO, RICHARD E. JAMAR and others
Stone Street Capital, LLC v. CFSF Lotteries, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00881
Plaintiff:
Stone Street Capital, LLC
Defendant:
CFSF Lotteries, LLC and Credit Shelter Trust Under LWT of Philip M. Kaplan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
