Cases 41 - 50 of 146
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00929
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bailey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01973
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Ruiz v. William Barr, et al
as 21-15301
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Joe Doe, United States Assistant Attorney General for the District of Arizona "Tucson", RAMIRO S. FLORES, named as Federal Public Defender, LYNNETTE C. KIMMINS, U.S. Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona "Tucson" and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN MORENO RUIZ
Ruiz v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Michael Bailey, Lynnette C Kimmins, Ramiro S Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv17282
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14410
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcum v. Bailey et al
as 2:2020cv00628
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation and Correctional Officer Michael Bailey
Plaintiff:
Shane Marcum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoskins v. Rodman et al
as 3:2020cv01068
Defendant:
Mr. Shirley, John Doe, Mr. Oleary and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01675
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
