Cases 41 - 50 of 142
(PC)Myers v. California Correctional Healthcare Services
as 2:2020cv00561
Plaintiff:
Michael Craig Myers
Defendant:
California Correctional Healthcare Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36481
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CRAIG BRITTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myers v. California Correctional Healthcare Services
as 3:2020cv01598
Plaintiff:
Michael Craig Myers
Defendant:
California Correctional Healthcare Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cagle v. Hamilton County Government et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Cagle
Defendant:
Michael Craig, Joseph Jones, Wesley Birjkovff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Worsham v. IRS
as 20-1270
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL CRAIG WORSHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Andersen et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11331
Plaintiff:
Joe Stern, Brent Cook, Judy Brown and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Craig v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00903
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Michael Craig
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Craig Sports, LLC, et al
as 5:2016cv01941
Defendant:
Craig Sports, LLC d/a/a Gators Sports Bar & Grill, Craig Sports, LLC, Craig Sports, LLC individually doing business as Gators Sports Bar and Grill and others
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc, Broadcast Music, Inc., Sony ATV Songs LLC doing business as Sony ATV Acuff Rose Music and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Kohlhagen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Michael Craig Kohlhagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
