Cases 41 - 50 of 237
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Lynch v. Wiggins
as 3:2021cv00011
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lynch
Defendant:
Officer Bryan M Wiggins and Bryan M. Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive American Insurance Company v. De Pinto et al
as 3:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Tyler Huynh, Melvin Oved Banegas-Amaya, Matthew Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Robinson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00358
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Melvin Richard Robinson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
PAUL v. USA
as 1:2020cv01069
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MELVIN RAIMUND PAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Hardee et al
as 5:2020ct03242
Defendant:
Mike Hardee and Melvin Blow
Plaintiff:
Diondre Ke-Sean Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerman v. AT&T Corporation
as 3:2020cv00384
Plaintiff:
Melvin McCoy Jerman
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Melvin v. USA
as 5:2020cv00319
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Javarus Omar Melvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tucker v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
James Melvin Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
