Cases 41 - 50 of 390
Ager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10559
Plaintiff:
John Ager, Jerry Antoine, Elizabeth Arflin and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Ager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Ager, Jerry Antoine, Elizabeth Arflin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BLM Of The Shenandoah Valley, LLC et al v. Smith et al
as 5:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
BLM Of The Shenandoah Valley, LLC, Cameron Turley, Bonnie Jo Chapman and others
Defendant:
Donald L. Smith, Timothy Martin and Augusta County, VA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STERN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55473
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PHILLIP STERN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Singh v. Oss et al
as 3:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillip Singh
Defendant:
Jamie M Oss, Bethany J Beckman, Lyn M Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Patrakis
as 21-16266
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PHILLIP PATRAKIS
Bartoli v. Phillips
as 4:2021cv01236
Respondent:
Warden Michael Phillips
Petitioner:
Eric Bartoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35745
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PHILLIP TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vincent White, Jr. v. Michael Phillips
as 21-3546
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINCENT D. WHITE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL PHILLIPS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
