Cases 41 - 50 of 3,866
Barrett Business Services Inc v. Moody
as 3:2024cv05183
Plaintiff:
Barrett Business Services Inc
Defendant:
Caroline Moody
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MOODY v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv01356
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MABLE MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BEAGLES v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
JOHNNY DALTON BEAGLES
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toles v. Newsome et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Quonterious Toles
Defendant:
Lt. Newsome and CO II Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moody v. McDonough
as 24-450
Plaintiff:
MARY MOODY
Defendant:
DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs, a Cabinet Member and Chief Executive of the Veterans Affairs, a Federal Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
