Cases 41 - 47 of 47
FLEMING v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JEFFERSON FLEMING
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, S.C.I. ALBION, HARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 5:2012hc02173
Petitioner:
Hakim Barbour
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Parole Board and Lackawanna Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHABAZZ v Pennsylvania Parole Board
as 5:2012cv00242
Petitioner:
YUSAF A SHABAZZ
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv02425
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MILES JOHNSON
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THIRTY-EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA , ANN THORNBURG WEISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sean Moriarty v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 12-1856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN P. MORIARTY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LAWRENCE MURRAY, Pennsylvania Parole Board Secretary
Sean Moriarty v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 12-1856
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID VARANO, SCI Coal Township Superintendent, KRISTEN P. RISINGER, Chief Official Inmate Grievance Officer, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN P. MORIARTY
Debtor / Appellee:
LAWRENCE MURRAY, Pennsylvania Parole Board Secretary
Cleland v. State of Indiana Parole Board et al
as 3:2009cv02110
Petitioner:
William Cleland
Respondent:
State of Indiana Parole Board, Attorney General of State of Indiana, State of Pennsylvania Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
