Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00494
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Bagley v. PennyMac Corp.
as 3:2016cv00420
Plaintiff:
Claresa Bagley
Defendant:
PennyMac Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2296
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PennyMac Corp. v. Christa N. Canavan, et al
as 1:2015cv13438
Plaintiff:
PennyMac Corp.
Defendant:
Christa Canavan, Robert H. Norton and J. Michael Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pennymac Corp. v. Javalina Options, et al.
as 2:2015cv01709
ThirdParty Defendant:
Absolute Collection Services, LLC
Defendant:
Absolute Collection Services, LLC, Clinton Haywood Bassett, Javalina Options and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Loretto Bay-Bella Lago Homeowners Association
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Corp.
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2305 Review of Federal Contract
Pennymac Corp v. Steven T Morizono et al
as 8:2015cv01281
Defendant:
Does, Lorraine J Lim and Steven T Morizono
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Corp
Derrico v. Pennymac Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv01165
Plaintiff:
Deon Derrico
Defendant:
MTC Financial, Inc. and Pennymac Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Pennymac Corp v. Robert A. Bradley et al
as 8:2015cv00467
Movant:
Parvati Bradley
Defendant:
Robert A Bradley and Does
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Corp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00777
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
