Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Philip Johnson et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
Philip Johnson, Philip Johnson, Philip Johnson and others
Defendant:
Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Countrywide Bank FSB and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2008cv05425
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, MARTIN HORN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Philip Johnson v. State of New York, et al
as 08-3419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, CITY OF NEW YORK, THE CITY OF NEW YORK ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Michael Bell
as 08-2734
Not Party - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL BELL
Not Party:
PHILIP JOHNSON, DA ERIE CTY and ATTY GEN PA
Johnson v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2008cv00887
Plaintiff:
Karl Philip Johnson
Defendant:
City of San Diego, San Diego Police Department, Jamie Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2008cv00231
Plaintiff:
PHILIP JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, CITY OF NEW YORK, N.Y. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2007cv01853
Plaintiff:
PHILIP JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE CITY OF NEW YORK ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES CASEWORKERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Philip Johnson v. AC&S, Inc., et al.
as VAE/4:04-CV-02860
Plaintiff:
David Philip Johnson
Defendant:
AC&S, Inc
BRANDON v. JOHNSON, et al
as 2:2000cv01656
Petitioner:
CURTIS BRANDON
Respondent:
PHILIP JOHNSON , MICHAEL FISHER and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
