Cases 41 - 50 of 11,426
Wilson v. Consumer Legal Group P.C. et al
as 2:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Chance Wilson
Defendant:
Consumer Legal Group P.C. and Phoenix Debt Pros, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wilson v. Consumer Legal Group P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Chance Wilson
Defendant:
Consumer Legal Group P.C. and Phoenix Debt Pros, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Phoenix International Holdings, Inc. v. Great Eastern Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Phoenix International Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Great Eastern Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Nakanwagi v. City of Phoenix, et al.
as 24-1862
Plaintiff:
SARAH NATHREEN NAKANWAGI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF ARIZONA, COUNTY OF MARICOPA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Guenther
as 1:2024cv04294
Plaintiff:
Wade Guenther
Defendant:
Wilshire Phoenix Funds LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
GUENTHER vs. WILSHIRE PHOENIX FUNDS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04294
Plaintiff:
WADE GUENTHER
Defendant:
WILSHIRE PHOENIX FUNDS, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Peters v. Dayton-Phoenix Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Valerie Peters
Defendant:
Dayton-Phoenix Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
ColonialWebb Contractors Company v. Hill Phoenix, Inc.
as 24-1237
Plaintiff:
COLONIAL WEBB CONTRACTORS COMPANY and COLONIALWEBB CONTRACTORS COMPANY
Defendant:
HILL PHOENIX, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
