Cases 41 - 50 of 4,284
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Howard Wiley v. Quinn Lu
as 2:2024cv01934
Plaintiff:
Edward Howard Wiley
Defendant:
Doctor Quinn Lu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campos et al v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Aida Esmeralda Campos, Amy O'Neill, Autumn Byars and others
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents a constitutionally created body corporate doing business as Arizona State University and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Darwin Quinn, et al v. Roland Powell, et al
as 24-11414
Plaintiff:
DARWIN QUINN and MITCHELLE'L SIUM
Defendant:
ROLAND POWELL, p.k.a. Lil Duval, RICH BROKE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC and COREY DENNARD, p.k.a. Mr. Hanky
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. Mark Hayes
as 24-6248
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
MARK J. HAYES, HOPE M. BLACKLEY, GAIL MOFFITT and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals
as 24-6249
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg, AGENT DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer, WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL, Stevenston, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
