Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,651
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff: Darius Jason Soto
Defendant: Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurt v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03827
Plaintiff: Reginald Hurt
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Reginald Dunahue v. Curry Branham, et al
as 24-1983
Plaintiff: Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant: Curry Branham, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Kendrick Avery, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Aundrea Culclager, Warden, Tucker Max, ADC and others
Ward v. West Virginia Department of Health Services (BCSE) et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: Reginald Lee Ward, Jr.
Defendant: West Virginia Department of Health Services (BCSE) and Attorney Joseph Brophy Cordell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Black v. Murphy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv10634
Plaintiff: Yvonne Black and Yvonne Black [E-filer]
Defendant: Michael J. Murphy, Jason Pless, Reginald Van Wulfen and others
US v. Reginald Lindsey
as 24-6436
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: REGINALD WILLIAM LINDSEY
Williams v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff: Tariq D. Williams
Defendant: Sheriff Reginald Scandrett, Officer K. Crosby, Officer Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00179
Petitioner: Reginald Lee Clark
Respondent: Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Reginald Hitchcock
as 24-1377
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: REGINALD HITCHCOCK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?