Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Gara v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00769
Plaintiff:
Rame Gara
Defendant:
Randy Davis, C/O Kelly, Tracy Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nahom v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02048
Plaintiff:
Ruth Nahom
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of , Scottsdale Police Department , Michael R Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rames-Schultz v. Scientific Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2010hc60144
Plaintiff:
Mary Rames-Schultz
Defendant:
Changzhou SPL Company Ltd, Covidien, Inc., American Capital Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ziegler v. Becker et al
as 4:2009cv02941
Plaintiff:
Lashawn Ziegler
Defendant:
Christopher D. Becker, Karen Infante Allen, Ramee Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepard v. AHMSI Default Services et al
as 2:2009cv01916
Plaintiff:
David Shepard
Defendant:
AHMSI Default Services, Inc., American Brokers Conduit, T.D. Service Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. Rames
as 5:2008cv00504
Plaintiff:
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc., Virgin Records America, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kelly Kristina Rames
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Puckett et al v. Irwin County Detention Center
as 7:2008cv00061
Plaintiff:
Luther Puckett, James Donaldson, Jose Arellano and others
Defendant:
Irwin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rames Logistics, Inc. v. Lotte Trading New York Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv01264
Plaintiff:
Rames Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Lotte Trading New York Corporation, Lotte Trading New York Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Murphy v. Martel et al
as 2:2007cv00508
Plaintiff:
Robert Murphy
Defendant:
M. Martel, R. Hill, J P Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
