Cases 41 - 50 of 106
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv04077
Petitioner:
Ramon Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ramon Hernandez Martinez v. United State
as 16-2593
Petitioner:
Ramon Hernandez Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv21795
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hernandez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NFL Properties LLC et al v. Humpries et al
as 3:2016cv00474
Plaintiff:
NFL Properties LLC , Panthers Football, LLC and PDB Sports, Ltd
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, Felannia Humphries, Christophe Dion Duckett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
USA v. Jose Hernandez-Sanchez
as 15-51228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE RAMON HERNANDEZ-SANCHEZ
Gazco-Hernandez et al v. Neffenger et al
as 3:2015cv02267
Plaintiff:
Maria S Gazco-Hernandez , Ramon Hernandez and Conjugal Partnership Maria Gazco and Ramon Hernandez
Defendant:
Peter Neffenger, Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Exterior Walls, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04392
Defendant:
Exterior Walls, Inc., Carlos Moreno and Ivan Moreno
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
United States v. Ramon Hernandez
as 15-2572
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Ramon Hernandez
Hernandez v. Health Care Providers
as 2:2015cv00205
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hernandez
Defendant:
Health Care Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios et al v. Louya Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv06800
Plaintiff:
Juan Gomez Rios , Eliezer Francis , Gildardo Ojeda-Juarez and others
Defendant:
Louya Corp. , Service Corp. , JBB Bar and Grill Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
