Cases 41 - 50 of 1,207
Rodrigues v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nickelia Rodrigues
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. Janson et al
as 2:2023cv06916
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'neal Harris
Defendant:
Warden S. Janson, Officer P. Davis, R&D Officer Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodrigues Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4371
Petitioner:
AMANDA RODRIGUES SILVA, RICARDO ALVES DE PAULA and SAMILLY VITORIA ALVES DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
De Oliveira Rodrigues, et al v. Garland
as 23-2081
Petitioner:
JOZELIA MARIA DE OLIVEIRA RODRIGUES and E.C.D.O.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barrientes v. Warden USP Pollock
as 23-30896
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jesus Rodrigues Barrientes, also known as Jesus Rodriguez Barrientes
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden USP Pollock
Rodrigues v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv06385
Plaintiff:
Servante Rodrigues
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodrigues v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04077
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rodrigues
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Araujo Rodrigues Souza, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3970
Petitioner:
GELSMAR ARAUJO RODRIGUES SOUZA, SARA ALVES ARAUJO D'AVILA and LUCAS GABRIEL D'AVILA ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
