Cases 41 - 50 of 11,057
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Franklin v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Latrell Franklin, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, United States Postal Service and Kristen Ruth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Tipton v. Rayford
as 24-50214
Plaintiff:
Charlton Reed Tipton
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford, Christopher Pauley, Captain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ruth E. Trice, Captain of Correctional Officers and others
Anapol v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ruth Anapol
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera-De Ganuza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1624
Petitioner:
ANA RUTH HERRERA-DE GANUZA and JUSTIN YANCARLOS SORIANO-HERRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HOOPES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03454
Plaintiff:
RUTH HOOPES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
