Cases 41 - 50 of 1,054
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21755
Plaintiff:
SCOTT S. SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Calderon v. S. Smith
as 5:2023cv01585
Petitioner:
David Calderon
Respondent:
S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rajhans v. Smith
as 1:2023cv03251
Plaintiff:
Devlin Rajhans
Defendant:
Catherine S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lakisha Smith v. Maurunda Burgess
as 23-2655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lakisha S. Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Maurunda Burgess
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18052
Plaintiff:
ANDREA S SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lane v. Ivey et al
as 6:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Devon L. Lane
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Ivey, Officer Eliezer Nazario Guevara, Notary Jessica Michaud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowling v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, et al
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
daryl bowling
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS), robert green, Annie D. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Erik De Santiago v. S. Smith
as 2:2023cv05423
Petitioner:
Erik De Santiago
Respondent:
S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
