Cases 41 - 50 of 169
SAXE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv42130
Plaintiff:
LEVI SAXE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAXE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24361
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH SAXE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ager et al v. Eagle Bank et al
as 8:2020cv00562
Defendant:
Samantha Perry, Silver Lake LLC, Arlington Realty Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lajonne Ager and Wayne B. Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 7:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Jeff McCracken, County of Orange, James T. Bryan, III and others
Plaintiff:
Napier Sandford Fuller and Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee et al v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 7:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Jeff McCracken, County of Orange, James T. Bryan, III and others
Plaintiff:
Napier Sandford Fuller and Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sax et al v. Lucky 8 TV, LLC
as 1:2019cv08187
Defendant:
Lucky 8 TV, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandy Phillips-Johnson and Erin Sax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Koelzer v. Westrick et al
as 1:2019cv00618
Defendant:
Cole Hoyer, Aaron Westrick, Marilyn Innes and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Koelzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAX v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv09639
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIANE K SAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rager v. McMinn County (RLJ2)
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
McMinn County, Derrick Saxe and Joe Guy
Plaintiff:
Jaimie Rager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
