Cases 41 - 50 of 100
BLANTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv04867
Plaintiff:
TAI'SHAWN BLANTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and AYANNA KALYN BELL KOBIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04858
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
99c And More Corp. I v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv04857
Plaintiff:
99c And More Corp. I
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv08286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bankston v. Chipotle Services, LLC
as 5:2026cv08284
Plaintiff:
Rafael Bankston
Defendant:
Chipotle Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Tippin v. Namaste Laboratories LLC et al
as 1:2026cv09582
Plaintiff:
Karen Tippin
Defendant:
Namaste Laboratories LLC, Strength of Nature, LLC and Godrej SON Holdings, Inc.
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
