Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Plantation Open MRI LLC v. Infinity Auto Insurance Co.
as 19-11032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PLANTATION OPEN MRI LLC, agent of Jorge Hidalgo agent of Gloria Diaz agent of Shawn Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
INFINITY AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Plantation Open MRI LLC v. Infinity Auto Insurance Co.
as 19-10414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PLANTATION OPEN MRI LLC, agent of Jorge Hidalgo agent of Gloria Diaz agent of Shawn Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
INFINITY AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Thomas v. Steele
as 4:2017cv02822
Petitioner:
Shawn Thomas
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 4:2017cv00515
Plaintiff:
SHAWN THOMAS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KBR, INCORPORATED, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, LLC, HALLIBURTON COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ERKA LTD
Lau v. Kekuaokalani et al
as 1:2017cv00258
Plaintiff:
Shawn Thomas Lau
Defendant:
Michael Kekuaokalani, Denise Johnson and Richard Banner, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Shawn Thoma
as 17-1432
Petitioner:
In re: SHAWN THOMAS, a/k/a MALIK BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas v. United States of America
as 17-189
Petitioner - Appellant:
Shawn Thomas
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
THOMAS v. ORTIZ
as 1:2016cv05875
Petitioner:
SHAWN THOMAS
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
