Cases 41 - 50 of 2,171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LEE v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grey v. Brinson et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Raquan Grey
Defendant:
Brinson, Castillo, Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Badger Meter, Inc. v. Smith
as 5:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Badger Meter, Inc.
Defendant:
Travis Smith
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Delia G. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.M. v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Latoya Monley and A. M.
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, sheronica smith, SHERIFF RALPH KERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lockhart v. Smith et al
as 5:2023ct03318
Plaintiff:
Domenico Alexander Lockhart
Defendant:
Shanan Smith and Robin Bullard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kanisha Monique Latrice Erwin
Defendant:
Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services, Angela C. Karchmer, Tereasa L. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
