Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Select Comfort Corporation v. Sleep Better Store, LLC
as 3:2012mc00009
Plaintiff:
Select Comfort Corporation
Defendant:
Sleep Better Store, LLC
Select Comfort Corporation v. Sleep Better Store, LLC, The
as 1:2012cv01665
Plaintiff:
Select Comfort Corporation
Defendant:
Sleep Better Store, LLC, The
Interested_party:
Outlast Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Select Comfort Corporation v. The Sleep Better Store, LLC et al
as 0:2012cv01148
Plaintiff:
Select Comfort Corporation
Defendant:
The Sleep Better Store, LLC, The Merrick Group, LLC and Merrick Group Capital 1, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Select Comfort Corporation v. Plushbeds, Inc.
as 0:2012cv00347
Plaintiff:
Select Comfort Corporation
Defendant:
Plushbeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Jobri, LLC v. Select Comfort Corporation
as 12-7003
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
JOBRI, LLC
Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff - Appellant:
SELECT COMFORT CORPORATION
Jobri, LLC v. Select Comfort
as 12-7001
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
JOBRI, LLC
Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff - Appellee:
SELECT COMFORT CORPORATION
Goldfaden v. Select Comfort Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
as 2:2011cv02525
Plaintiff:
Donald Goldfaden
Defendant:
Select Comfort Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Select Comfort Corporation v. Lateral Monopoly LLC, et al
as 2:2011cv01488
Plaintiff:
Select Comfort Corporation
Defendant:
Christopher Kelso, David Stephens and Lateral Monopoly LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Select Comfort Corporation v. Lateral Monopoly LLC d/b/a Sleep Alternatives et al
as 2:2011at00803
Plaintiff:
Select Comfort Corporation
Defendant:
Lateral Monopoly LLC d/b/a Sleep Alternatives, Christopher Kelso, David Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
