Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shomo et al v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Company
as 1:2011cv00633
Plaintiff:
Marsha Shomo , R.N. Thompson & Associates Inc. , Winding Ridge Golf Course LLC and others
Defendant:
EI DuPont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Imprelis Herbicide Marketing Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Washtenaw Acquisition LLC , Polo Fields East LLC , Polo Fields Golf & Country Club LLC and others
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shomo v. City of New York
as 11-2642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose J. Shomo
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, William Fraser, Commissioner of City Department of Corrections, Eric Perry, Director and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Joy Meyers, Shahid Nawaz and Rameen Seegobin
Chandan Vora v. Conspirators, et al
as 11-1390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSPIRATORS, CODE DEPT HEAD MR SHOMO OF CITY OF JOHNSTOWN and PERMIT OFFICERS
VORA v. CONSPIRATORS et al
as 3:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
DR. CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant:
CONSPIRATORS, CODE DEPARTMENT HEAD MR. SHOMO OF CITY OF JOHNSTOWN and PERMIT OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Martinec et al v. Party Line Cruise Company
as 1:2008mi00213
Plaintiff:
Denise Martinec, Patricia Wilson, Milady Ferrer and others
Defendant:
Party Line Cruise Company
Petitioner:
Schiff Hardin LLP
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Martinec et al v. Party Line Cruise Company
as 9:2007cv80098
Plaintiff:
Denise Martinec, Patricia Wilson, Milady Ferrer and others
Defendant:
Party Line Cruise Company and Antoine Gurrey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
