Cases 41 - 50 of 10,226
Tonneyck et al v. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
Reony Tonneyck, Robert Hann and Ronald Hinton
Defendant:
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc., Roxanne Bowman, Elaine L. Chao and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banks et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2024cv01119
Plaintiff:
Ronald Banks, Michael Dejean and Marion Sample
Defendant:
Gurpreet Singh and Canada Kings Carrier, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv02628
Plaintiff:
Deputy D.A. Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Warden Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stonebraker et al v. LF2 Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mason Stonebraker and Tiffany Edwards
Defendant:
LF2 Inc., LF4 Inc., LF7 Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
(PC) Freeman v. Dudley et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Kyle Freeman
Defendant:
Dudley, R. Singh, E. Tardd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MATTA v. KAUR et al
as 2:2024cv05743
Plaintiff:
RAHUL MATTA
Defendant:
ANTER PREET KAUR, HARINDER PAL SINGH, KAMALJIT KAUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singh v. Garland
as 24-2686
Petitioner:
PARMINDERPAL SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
