Cases 41 - 50 of 113
FORRESTER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03254
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WAYNE FORRESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mount v. Dunn et al
as 2:2017cv01209
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wayne Mount
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-50495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stephen Gooch v. Marion County Jail, et al
as 17-10553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN WAYNE GOOCH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARION COUNTY JAIL, MARION COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Gooch v. Marion County Jail et al
as 5:2016cv00573
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wayne Gooch
Defendant:
Marion County Jail, Marion County Jail Medical, Marion County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00790
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Westmoreland et al v. R Trucking Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00508
Plaintiff:
Melissa Knight Westmoreland and Stephen Wayne Westmoreland
Defendant:
R Trucking Corporation and Ronald William Pinkney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blanks v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01539
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Blanks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Stephen Mullican
as 16-5926
Movant:
In re: STEPHEN WAYNE MULLICAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shores v. Collins et al
as 3:2015cv01030
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D. Shores
Defendant:
Beverly Collins, Stephen Wayne Siegal, County of Nassau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
