Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Dixon v. Charlotte County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Dixon
Defendant:
Charlotte County Sheriff's Office, Corizon, Inc., Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Dixon v. Secretary, Department of Corr, et al
as 13-13214
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS T. DIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and WARDEN
Dixon et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-16716
Plaintiff:
Janice T. Dixon and Franklin K. Dixon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Dixon et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv16716
Plaintiff:
Janice T. Dixon and Franklin K. Dixon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dixon et al v. City Of Wilmington et al
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Dixon and Rosalyn Henderson-Dixon
Defendant:
City Of Wilmington , Corporal Barnes , Patrolman Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tammi T. Dixon
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dixon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv01704
Petitioner:
Marcus T. Dixon
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and FNU Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Lashley et al
as 1:2011cv02226
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Joseph C. Lashley, II and Gisela T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
