Cases 41 - 50 of 209,036
Broadnax v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marcus Derick Broadnax
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ortiz v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ismael Ortiz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reza v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valero Marketing and Supply Company v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Valero Marketing and Supply Company
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax
Mendiola v. United States of America
as 24-3218
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL MENDIOLA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hudwell et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Malika Hudwell, Ikeem Adams, Malika Hudwell on behalf of minor children Z.H.T. and N.H.A. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Davis v. United States, et al
as 24-3045
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, City of Washington, District of Columbia, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR. and others
Sergio Mejia-Duarte v. USA
as 24-11547
Petitioner:
SERGIO NEFTALI MEJIA-DUARTE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Murgio v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03650
Petitioner:
Anthony R. Murgio
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Juan Argueta-Portillo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1886
Petitioner:
JUAN ALEXANDER ARGUETA-PORTILLO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
