Cases 41 - 50 of 115
James et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2019cv01498
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, David N Ray, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tiffany, Christopher Kopf, John A James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CSX Transportation, Inc., et al v. SMART-Transp. Div., et al
as 19-1138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY, CO., NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MECHANICAL DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT, TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS and others
Defendant:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al v. Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen et al
as 5:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and The Texas Mexican Railway Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen and Chris Heise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mero v. National Railroad Adjustment Board et al
as 5:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Pershing Mero, Jr
Defendant:
National Railroad Adjustment Board, Kansas City Southern Railway Co and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, General Committee of Adjustment for CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Cameron et al
as 1:2016cv03609
Plaintiff:
The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, General Committee of Adjustment for CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
John P Cameron and Jean F Cameron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Healey v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al
as 16-2171
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Intervenor:
TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, MECHANICAL DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN and others
CSX Transportation, Inc., et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS INC, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant - Appellant:
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT, TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Oliva v. The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen et al
as 2:2016cv04966
Defendant:
Eric Martin and The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Oliva
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Armstrong et al v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen - NS Southern Lines GCA et al
as 1:2016cv01664
Plaintiff:
Armstrong, Nicholas D Davis, Mathew C Taylor and others
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen - NS Southern Lines GCA, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen -- NS Eastern Lines GCA and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
