Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 511
TORRENCE v. HUTCHINSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00007
Petitioner: TYRAIL TORRENCE
Respondent: J. HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TORRENCE v. HUTCHINSON
as 2:2022cv05262
Petitioner: TYRAIL TORRENCE
Respondent: J. HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Belcher v. Wallen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00911
Plaintiff: Torrence Belcher
Defendant: Joshua Wallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivory v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05779
Plaintiff: Torrence Ivory
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Former Police Sgt. Ronald Watts, Former CPD Officer Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TORRENCE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20435
Plaintiff: ANTHONY TORRENCE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Hikeem Torrence
as 22-2803
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: HIKEEM TORRENCE, aka HAK
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00668
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Roupp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03413
Plaintiff: Torrence Roupp
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abraham Cruz v. Torrence State Hospital, et al
as 22-2668
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABRAHAM CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee: TORRENCE STATE HOSPITAL, DIRECTOR, DAVID R. CASHMAN and others
Sanders v. Toby
as 1:2022cv03606
Petitioner: Torrence Sanders
Respondent: Annettia Toby and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?