Cases 41 - 50 of 2,282
Manning v. Bloodworth et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Darcye Manning
Defendant:
Glenn Bloodworth and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Morris v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Keith Morris
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Jesse Jimenez, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
United Parcel Service Inc v. NLRB
as 24-1530
Petitioner:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
NLRB v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Perez v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Edward Perez
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.- Ohio, Kerith Rashford and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McNaughton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Dwayne McNaughton
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 215 fl FLSA: Prohibited Acts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
