Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Driscol v. P.U. Patel, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Driscol
Defendant:
P.U. Patel, LLC and Vimal Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeet et al v. Henderson
as 2:2016cv02474
Plaintiff:
Anurashika Jeet and Vimal Singh
Defendant:
Michelle Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ahuja v. Beautiful Brows, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03221
Plaintiff:
Vimal Ahuja
Defendant:
Beautiful Brows, LLC, Saleema Delawalla and Saleem Delawalla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Birrell, et al., v. Fox, et al.,
as 2:2016cv01818
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Birrell , Raymond D. Jackson, Sr. , Sidney Ross Deegan, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Fox, Joseph A. Bick, M. Cordero-Boucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Shri Yogiraj, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv01319
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Defendant:
Shri Yogiraj, LLC, Vimal Patel, Devendra Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 4
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. HH PRAMUKH, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv08825
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
HH PRAMUKH, LLC, N GUNATITPRAKESH PATEL, VIMAL PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KHOSLA v. SODHI et al
as 1:2014cv06984
Plaintiff:
OM PERKASH KHOSLA
Defendant:
VIMAL K. SODHI and NEENA SODHI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arciaga et al v. Barrett Business Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05884
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Arciaga , Joseph Masseli and Vimal Mathimaran
Defendant:
Barrett Business Services, Inc. , Michael L. Elich and James D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Brown v. Whitten, et al.
as 2:2014cv00848
Plaintiff:
Michael K Brown
Defendant:
Whitten, Vimal Singh, W. J. Sinkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
