Cases 41 - 50 of 2,747
Woods v. Ralston et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Woods
Defendant:
George Ralston, Paula Price, Tracie Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EXUM v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv03891
Plaintiff:
ALFONZO EXUM
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE and JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proctor, Jr. v. Dialesandro et al
as 9:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
James Hildred Proctor, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Dialesandro, John Stabiel, Jr., John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williamson et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01781
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kenneth Williamson, Antonio Bundy and Nicholas Edwards
Defendant:
John E Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Erin Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Green v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2710
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, DR. REKHA HALLIGAN, PA STROUP and others
Wetzel v. Sangraw
as 2:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
Dustin R Wetzel
Defendant:
Zachary Sangraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABEL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CAIN ABEL
Defendant:
M. ADAMS, K. FEATHERS and J. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalil Hammond v. Robert Krak, et al
as 23-2749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALIL K. HAMMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT M. KRAK, D.M.D., SUPERINTENDENT LOUIS FOLINO, IRMA VIHLIDAL, Health Care Administrator and others
JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JONES and SHAMEL JONES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
