Cases 41 - 50 of 50
William O. Steele, et al. v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-76883
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
William O. Steele
USA v. William Steel
as 09-50335
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. STEEL
Kovala v. Steele et al
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Kovala
Defendant:
William M. Steele, Stephen S. Snook, Barry Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Steele v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv00683
Petitioner:
William Stewart Steele
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEELE, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86594
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS STEELE, JR.
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Steele v. Quarterman
as 08-40379
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES STEELE
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Steele v. Banks et al
as 3:2007cv00337
Plaintiff:
William A. Steele
Defendant:
Jaquelyn Banks and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Langley et al
as 2:2007cv00422
Plaintiff:
William James Steele
Defendant:
Jesse Langley and Kevin McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Lloyd Steele, Jr., et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:06-CV-00120
Plaintiff:
William Lloyd Steele, Jr
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Picard Chem Inc Plan, et al v. Perrigo Company, et al
as 1:1995cv00141
Defendant:
C. G. Grefenstette, Juliet Lea Hillman, Joseph Klingenmeyer Management Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, Edward R. Pepper, Elsie S. Feldman and others
Claimant:
Grover H. Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
