Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Morgan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Darius Laquan Morgan
Defendant:
William E. Johnson, Chester V. Huffman, FNU Elim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilhy Harpo v. Ronald Strength, et al
as 12-13810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILHY HARPO, f.k.a. Willie Wesley Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD STRENGTH, CHARLES A. TOOLE, SR., WILLIAM E. JOHNSON and others
Johnson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2012cv00549
Defendant:
All Texas Law Enforcement Agencies, State of Texas, TDCJ-CID and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wonders v. Johnson et al
as 4:2012cv01479
Plaintiff:
Scott Wonders
Defendant:
William E Johnson, Jacob S Mattis and The Matthews Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Harpo v. Strength et al
as 1:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Ronald Strength, Charles A. Toole, Sr., William E. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harpo v. Strength et al
as 1:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Ronald Strength, Charles A. Toole, Sr., William E. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON V. MITCHELL
as 2:2011cv03194
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. JOHNSON and TAMEKA JOHNSON
Defendant:
ELLEN J. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the U.S., et al
as 11-20381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
